Tiger Tail (oz8522)


Tiger Tail (oz8522) by Ron Chidgey 1973 - plan thumbnail

About this Plan

Tiger Tail. RC pattern plane, from RCM&E April 1973.

Also kitted by Southern RC.

Quote: "Two time winner of the US Nationals can't be a bad record!

IN opening this discussion of the Tiger Tail, I guess I'm supposed to give you a sales pitch that will convince you to build one. I'm really not too sure if this is a good idea, since your flying will probably improve and us old folks don't need any of that! It gets tougher to win every year. And besides, Tiger Tail really has only two things of any importance going for it - it's ugly and it's honest! The 'ugly' part helps, since everyone knows ugly airplanes fly better, witness Kwik Fli (oz6526), Daddy Rabbit (oz5535), and Cutlass! One of my grammar school drop-out friends once remarked in a kidding session: It's ugly enough to be called a trainer. The only reply I could manage was: Pretty is as pretty does.

Which brings us to its most important attribute: 'Tiger Tail' is a completely honest airplane. Honest! I have built six of them over the past two years, one with fixed gear, and they have all flown almost identically, being completely predictable in their flying characteristics. I think this thing of 'honesty' or 'predictability' is the single most important factor a competition airplane can bring to the party. It far outweighs most other differences in design and styling. Needless to say, it is very disconcerting to have your airplane do something completely uncalled for in the middle of a heated contest.

If the quality of our flying has improved over the past four or five years, and I think it most certainly has, it is primarily due to:

(1) better radio equipment,
(2) better engines, and
(3) retractable landing gears.

Airplane design (or style) may have made a marginal contribution, but it is a secondary factor. There are several 'vintage' designs which, given the benefit of our really good radios and engines and modernized with retracts, could win today as easily as they did yesterday. In fact, I think we sometimes design ourselves into a built-in handicap in an effort to be different. I guess my philosophy has been to strive for good flying characteristics first and aesthetics second.

A good competitive design should certainly minimize the work the pilbt has to do. You will be surprised how good a conventional type like Tiger Tail begins to look after you have won a few first places with it. I know that last July, in Chicago, it was the most gorgeous airplane I had ever seen!

While Tiger Tail isn't a radically new design, it does have a few subtle differences worth mentioning. You will notice the airfoil progresses from a rather thick symmetrical centre section to a lifting (semi-symmetrical) tip section. I don't make any great claims for this combina-tion; however, Tiger Tail can be slowed down very nicely for landing without any fear of abrupt tip stalls, whereas many other designs with sharply tapered wings cannot. I don't know whether this is all due to the lifting tip, but I think it helps. The thick (17 per cent) centre section gives a good degree of air speed control. When you throttle back, the air-plane slows at a good rate, but oddly enough, the top end doesn't suffer. Tiger Tail was as fast as most at last year's US Nats.

The strip ailerons begin fairly far out-board for a good reason. The inboard portion of the strip is ineffective for generating rolling forces, but does con-tribute lots of drag when pushed out into the breeze. The outboard configuration improves the rolls by keeping speed up.

The fuselage shape is narrow and deep up front, as you might expect, but it also has a relatively wide tail cone, which may seem a bit odd. This was done to structurally stiffen the fuselage and provide a more rigid mount for the tail surfaces. If possible, I wanted to eliminate some of the flutter of the control surfaces caused by vibration. This flutter is transmitted through the pushrods and really works on the servo feed back pots.

Simplicity is the essence of good design and Tiger Tail's construction is simple and straightforward. If you must build one, let me carry you through the building sequence, almost step-by-step, since it may save you some time.

Construction: Cut foam cores from 1 lb foam. Be sure you cut a left and a right panel. Mark them immediately after cutting, because it is difficult to see the slight amount of lift in the-tip section. The sections shown on the plans..."

Direct submission to Outerzone.

Update 26/10/2017: Resized this plan to correct scale, thanks to RFJ.

Note for a higher resolution scan (easier to read) of essentailly the same plan, see the Tiger Tail (oz11195) from Southern RC.

Update 28/05/2019: Added additional article (from MAN, March 1972), thanks to RFJ.

Supplementary file notes

Article pages, thanks to RFJ.
Article (MAN).


Did we get something wrong with these details about this plan (especially the datafile)? That happens sometimes. You can help us fix it.
Add a correction

Tiger Tail (oz8522) by Ron Chidgey 1973 - model pic

  • (oz8522)
    Tiger Tail 
    by Ron Chidgey
    from RCME
    April 1973 
    64in span
    IC R/C LowWing
    clean :)
    all formers complete :)
    got article :)
  • Submitted: 07/03/2017
    Filesize: 607KB
    Format: • PDFbitmap
    Credit*: Circlip
    Downloads: 2667

Tiger Tail (oz8522) by Ron Chidgey 1973 - pic 003.jpg

Do you have a photo you'd like to submit for this page? Then email admin@outerzone.co.uk

User comments

No comments yet for this plan. Got something to say about this one?
Add a comment



Download File(s):
  • Tiger Tail (oz8522)
  • Plan File Filesize: 607KB Filename: Tiger_Tail_64in_oz8522.pdf
  • Supplement Filesize: 2646KB Filename: Tiger_Tail_64in_oz8522_article.pdf
  • Supplement Filesize: 2938KB Filename: Tiger_Tail_64in_oz8522_article_MAN.pdf
  • help with downloads


* Credit field

The Credit field in the Outerzone database is designed to recognise and credit the hard work done in scanning and digitally cleaning these vintage and old timer model aircraft plans to get them into a usable format. Currently, it is also used to credit people simply for uploading the plan to a forum on the internet. Which is not quite the same thing. This will change soon. Probably.


This model plan (like all plans on Outerzone) is supposedly scaled correctly and supposedly will print out nicely at the right size. But that doesn't always happen. If you are about to start building a model plane using this free plan, you are strongly advised to check the scaling very, very carefully before cutting any balsa wood.


Terms of Use

© Outerzone, 2011-2024.

All content is free to download for personal use.

For non-personal use and/or publication: plans, photos, excerpts, links etc may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Outerzone with appropriate and specific direction to the original content i.e. a direct hyperlink back to the Outerzone source page.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's owner is strictly prohibited. If we discover that content is being stolen, we will consider filing a formal DMCA notice.