Whitehead 21 (oz13672)

 

Whitehead 21 (oz13672) by Ken Johnson 1982 - plan thumbnail

About this Plan

Whitehead No.21. Free flight scale model for rubber power.

Quote: "Whitehead No.21 Monoplane, by Ken Johnson. An interesting scale model, as the original may have flown before the Wright Brother's aircraft. Lesson: If you're ever the first to do something historical, make sure someone takes pictures!

Did Gustave Whitehead and his #21 monoplane truly fly on August 14, 1901? This date was over 2 years before the Wright brothers flew at Kittyhawk.

This question prompted me to read the article on Whitehead in the November 1968 issue of American Aircraft Modeler magazine. According to this AAM write-up, there were numerous eyewitnesses who related seeing Whitehead in #21 fly for up to 1/2 mile in distance. The Wright's flight was 122 feet in length.

While working in Dayton, Ohio in 1975, I was a contestant in a paper airplane contest held in the convention center. This building has two marble pillars in the lobby, marking the distance of the Kittyhawk flight. The contestants in the contest stood on a low platform at the one pillar and flew their paper gliders toward the other pillar. The winning flight went past the 122 ft marker and struck the wall a good 30 ft behind it.

The reason the Kittyhawk flight was recognized as the first powered flight was that a local photographer snapped that famous picture we all know, with the airplane about 4 ft off the ground. A helper in black suit and cap is standing near one wingtip. Unfortunately there were NO photos of the Whitehead aircraft. Just accounts from eight eyewitnesses who saw #21 fly.

A friend of the Whitehead family, Miss Stella Randolph, wrote a book about Mr Whitehead and his experiments with airplanes and engines. This work is titled 'Before the Wrights Flew,' and was published by G Putnam & Sons, in 1966. I found the book in my public library. Many photos and accounts of the planes can be found there. A second book by Miss Randolph is titled 'The Lost Flights of Gustave Whitehead.'

The AAM article contains an excellent three-view drawing of #21 by Bjorn Karlstrom.

Note: There is no intent herein to discredit the achievements of the Wright brothers, but to simply show a comparison with Mr. Whitehead. This airplane intrigued me personally for several reasons:

1. It had folding wings and tail.
2. The craft stood on four wheels.
3. The pilot was partially enclosed within the fuselage.
4. The two counter-rotating propellers were driven by one steam engine located in the front of the fuselage.
5. #21 could come down on the water, since the body of the plane was boat shaped.
6. To turn the craft, Mr Whitehead stood up and pulled on the wires which supported the wings. This amounted to wing warping and the resulting drag made the plane turn.

As I studied the three-view, I wondered if it would fly with no vertical fin. #21 had none. And how would I make a rubber powered model of it with one rubber band driving two propellers?

The plan was drawn up to a span of 22 inches and construction began. The rubber motor was enclosed in the fuselage, with a two-pulley arrangement forward of the front hook. The propellers each had a pulley just behind which connected to the motor hook pulley by a tied length of thin thread. The model was covered with condenser paper.

The wing structure was made of what appears to be tapered bamboo poles connected at the root and fanning out toward the tip of each wing. To simulate this in the model, 1/16 sq balsa strips were sanded round and tapered smaller toward the tips. This is accomplished by holding a small square of sandpaper (folded over) in one hand and spinning the strip of wood around through the sandpaper and drawing it back and forth simultaneously. The wood poles are coated with yellow marker and the joints marked with a thin brown ring.

Test flights on the completed model revealed that the pulley arrangement was inefficient and much power was lost with this type of drive train. The model flew in a straight line but wandered slightly from side to side. I concluded the reason being the absence of a vertical fin. This first model was set aside and eventually given to a friend when my family moved to California.

The second Whitehead model was built to the 13 inch Peanut size for the Model Builder Peanut Proxy Contest held in Long Beach, Ca. in 1978. The new craft was different in that is used a separate rubber motor for each propeller. Rear hooks were located on the top of the stab on each side. The model was covered with white Japanese tissue, and this time a scale-looking vertical fin was added. The performance was much improved..."

Whitehead 21, Model Builder, July 1982.

Direct submission to Outerzone.

Update 8/6/2022: Replaced this plan with a clearer copy, thanks to MB2020.

Supplementary file notes

Article pages, thanks to RFJ.
Previous scan version.

Corrections?

Did we get something wrong with these details about this plan (especially the datafile)? That happens sometimes. You can help us fix it.
Add a correction

Whitehead 21 (oz13672) by Ken Johnson 1982 - model pic

Datafile:
  • (oz13672)
    Whitehead 21
    by Ken Johnson
    from Model Builder
    July 1982 
    36in span
    Scale Rubber F/F Civil
    clean :)
    all formers complete :)
    got article :)
  • Submitted: 20/02/2022
    Filesize: 617KB
    Format: • PDFbitmap
    Credit*: Circlip, RFJ, MB2020
    Downloads: 770

ScaleType:
  • Whitehead_No._21 | help
    see Wikipedia | search Outerzone
    ------------
    Test link:
    search RCLibrary 3views (opens in new window)


    ScaleType: This (oz13672) is a scale plan. Where possible we link scale plans to Wikipedia, using a text string called ScaleType.

    If we got this right, you now have a couple of direct links (above) to 1. see the Wikipedia page, and 2. search Oz for more plans of this type. If we didn't, then see below.


    Notes:
    ScaleType is formed from the last part of the Wikipedia page address, which here is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitehead_No._21
    Wikipedia page addresses may well change over time.
    For more obscure types, there currently will be no Wiki page found. We tag these cases as ScaleType = NotFound. These will change over time.
    Corrections? Use the correction form to tell us the new/better ScaleType link we should be using. Thanks.

Whitehead 21 (oz13672) by Ken Johnson 1982 - pic 003.jpg
003.jpg

Do you have a photo you'd like to submit for this page? Then email admin@outerzone.co.uk

User comments

No comments yet for this plan. Got something to say about this one?
Add a comment

 

 
 

Download File(s):
  • Whitehead 21 (oz13672)
  • Plan File Filesize: 617KB Filename: Whitehead_21_oz13672_.pdf
  • Supplement Filesize: 2664KB Filename: Whitehead_21_oz13672_article.pdf
  • Supplement Filesize: 471KB Filename: Whitehead_21_oz13672_previous.pdf
  • help with downloads
 

Notes

* Credit field

The Credit field in the Outerzone database is designed to recognise and credit the hard work done in scanning and digitally cleaning these vintage and old timer model aircraft plans to get them into a usable format. Currently, it is also used to credit people simply for uploading the plan to a forum on the internet. Which is not quite the same thing. This will change soon. Probably.

Scaling

This model plan (like all plans on Outerzone) is supposedly scaled correctly and supposedly will print out nicely at the right size. But that doesn't always happen. If you are about to start building a model plane using this free plan, you are strongly advised to check the scaling very, very carefully before cutting any balsa wood.

 

Terms of Use

© Outerzone, 2011-2024.

All content is free to download for personal use.

For non-personal use and/or publication: plans, photos, excerpts, links etc may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Outerzone with appropriate and specific direction to the original content i.e. a direct hyperlink back to the Outerzone source page.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's owner is strictly prohibited. If we discover that content is being stolen, we will consider filing a formal DMCA notice.