Mitchell-Procter Kittiwake (oz13225)

 

Mitchell-Procter Kittiwake (oz13225) by Andrew Uminski 1973 - plan thumbnail

About this Plan

Mitchell-Procter Kittiwake. Control line scale model of the British 1960s homebuilt. Wingspan 48 in, for .35 engines. Scale is 1/6.

Quote: "This plane was designed and built in England by C Mitchell and RG Procter, two young technicians. Mitchell is a scientist at the Royal Aircraft Establishment in Farnborough and Procter is Assistant Technical Sales Manager for the British Aircraft Corp Ltd. Conceived as a glider tug, 'Kittiwake' was the first English all-metal home-built airplane; its first flight was made in April 1967. It is a low-wing monoplane with tricycle undercarriage, single-seater optimised to tow a 1000 lb glider to 2,000 ft as cheaply as possible, and designed for a gross weight of 1,350 lb or 1,250 lb fully aerobatic.

To achieve a high rate of descent, large flaps were chosen. The powerplant was chosen on the basis of cost/ performance sums to determine the power for minimum-cost operation. The results pointed to the 100 hp Rolls-Royce Continental 0-200-A flat four air-cooled piston engine made under license in England. This engine gives Kittiwake a performances marginally superior to that of the old Tiger Moth with about two-thirds of the power.

With the amateur builder in mind, the untapered wing was designed with all ribs flanged the same way to avoid the need for hand tools. The full size airplane has a NASA 3415 wing section. The only feature beyond an amateur's capability are the main undercarriage legs, bent up from 5/8 in steel plate and heat-treated to 100 tons/sq in.

There were many critics who doubted that a modern metal airplane could be built in a garage. Kittiwake has disproved them. The only tools needed are electric drills, tin snips, files, a set of home-made bending bars, hacksaw, pillar drill, hand squeeze riveter and other simple tools.

The builders reported considerable help from manufacturers in granting discounts on equipment for the prototype. For these reasons the cost has not been as high as might be expected. Total expenditure at the first flight amounted to approximately $3,125.00. Some of the aluminum alloy sheets used for Kittiwake were from TSR-2 English bomber which was not in production at the same time the Kittiwake began to grow.

The first flight and initial handling assessments were made from Lasham Airfield. Kittiwake taxied nicely and the wheel brakes indeed were effective. Its flying characteristics were quite good. Level speed achieved at 2,500 ft was 95 knots. Service ceiling reached 14,000 ft. Kittiwake has some STOL characteristics: take-off to 50 ft was 890 ft and landing distance from 50 ft to about 900 ft. A most amusing thing to try with full flap is a power-off descent at 80 knots: so huge are the flaps that Kittiwake literally has to be stood on her nose to get speed - a most effective way of getting back to earth after launching a glider.

Kittiwake was not put in series production, but complete plans for homebuilders to build the full size plane are available in England.

My Kittiwake was built in 1/6 scale and its span is 48 in. Because I do not live in the USA I could not depend on items from model shops, and most parts are home-made and work well. Though Kittiwake's shape seems to be very straight at the first time, do not think that it is especially for beginners - there are some points which are rather difficult for the inexperienced modeler.

If you decide to build this model, first of all you will have to choose what engine you want to put into Kittiwake. I used the Czech engine MVVS 35 R/C, but you can also use any good .29 or .40 engine with throttle control which is helpful for Scale models, especially for the Kittiwake which has flaps coupled with engine throttle. I think that you can use factory-made items, too, which will cut down the building time of your model.

CONSTRUCTION: Fuselage: I suggest building the model in following sequence: first we build the fuselage. If you have the specified engine, check to see if the engine bearers' width is suitable for your engine's dimensions. If not, this will have to be changed to your requirements. Next, decide if you want to use the original fuel tank as shown on the plan or a fuel tank bought from your hobby shop. When you begin to cut off formers Fl, F2 and F3 remember about the eventual changes.

Before assembly of the fuselage you will have to do the following things: first of all, mount nose wheel bearing to former F2. Then you can assemble the first three formers Fl, F2 and F3 together with engine bearers. Next install cabin floor with former F3, F4 and F5. At the same time you have to attach to former F4 under cabin floor two Dural angle bars for the control belicrank mounting... "

Kittiwake, MAN, May 1973.

Direct submission to Outerzone.

Supplementary file notes

Article pages, thanks to RFJ.

Corrections?

Did we get something wrong with these details about this plan (especially the datafile)? That happens sometimes. You can help us fix it.
Add a correction

Mitchell-Procter Kittiwake (oz13225) by Andrew Uminski 1973 - model pic

Datafile:
  • (oz13225)
    Mitchell-Procter Kittiwake
    by Andrew Uminski
    from Model Airplane News
    May 1973 
    48in span
    Scale IC C/L LowWing Civil
    clean :)
    all formers complete :)
    got article :)
  • Submitted: 05/04/2021
    Filesize: 723KB
    Format: • PDFbitmap
    Credit*: Circlip, RFJ
    Downloads: 504

ScaleType:
  • Mitchell_Kittiwake | help
    see Wikipedia | search Outerzone
    ------------
    Test link:
    search RCLibrary 3views (opens in new window)


    ScaleType: This (oz13225) is a scale plan. Where possible we link scale plans to Wikipedia, using a text string called ScaleType.

    If we got this right, you now have a couple of direct links (above) to 1. see the Wikipedia page, and 2. search Oz for more plans of this type. If we didn't, then see below.


    Notes:
    ScaleType is formed from the last part of the Wikipedia page address, which here is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell_Kittiwake
    Wikipedia page addresses may well change over time.
    For more obscure types, there currently will be no Wiki page found. We tag these cases as ScaleType = NotFound. These will change over time.
    Corrections? Use the correction form to tell us the new/better ScaleType link we should be using. Thanks.

Mitchell-Procter Kittiwake (oz13225) by Andrew Uminski 1973 - pic 003.jpg
003.jpg
Mitchell-Procter Kittiwake (oz13225) by Andrew Uminski 1973 - pic 004.jpg
004.jpg
Mitchell-Procter Kittiwake (oz13225) by Andrew Uminski 1973 - pic 005.jpg
005.jpg

Do you have a photo you'd like to submit for this page? Then email admin@outerzone.co.uk

User comments

I was delighted to spot the recent addition of the Mitchell Procter ('er' not 'or') KITTIWAKE to the Oz plans list. I was in the right place at the right time to fly the one built by RN Aircraft Apprentices and subsequently used by the gliding club at RNAS Yeovilton in the mid-1970s. There was a detailed write up of that build in the Jan 1972 issue of the PFA magazine "Popular Flying" (Vol 16 Number 1) I later hosted a visit by Sid King to take detailed photos for his scale model. G-BBRN was seriously damaged in a landing accident but later rebuilt by a PFA member who rather oversized the Mil side numbers.
If I can find some of the images I will forward them to Oz.
Mike Spencer - 11/08/2021
Doh, fixed the spelling now, many thanks.
SteveWMD - 11/08/2021
Add a comment

 

 
 

Download File(s):
 

Notes

* Credit field

The Credit field in the Outerzone database is designed to recognise and credit the hard work done in scanning and digitally cleaning these vintage and old timer model aircraft plans to get them into a usable format. Currently, it is also used to credit people simply for uploading the plan to a forum on the internet. Which is not quite the same thing. This will change soon. Probably.

Scaling

This model plan (like all plans on Outerzone) is supposedly scaled correctly and supposedly will print out nicely at the right size. But that doesn't always happen. If you are about to start building a model plane using this free plan, you are strongly advised to check the scaling very, very carefully before cutting any balsa wood.

 

Terms of Use

© Outerzone, 2011-2024.

All content is free to download for personal use.

For non-personal use and/or publication: plans, photos, excerpts, links etc may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Outerzone with appropriate and specific direction to the original content i.e. a direct hyperlink back to the Outerzone source page.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's owner is strictly prohibited. If we discover that content is being stolen, we will consider filing a formal DMCA notice.