Miss Lexington USA (oz11329)
About this Plan
Miss Lexington. Control line stunt model, for ST 46 engine.
Quote: "We predict that this design is destined to be a classic in its own time. Miss Lexington USA, by Wynn Paul.
In 1967, I took my University of Kentucky swim team to Gainesville, Florida, for the Conference Championships. At the airport, sitting in the middle of the field, was a Corsair F4-U fighter in flying condition. The asking price was $5000. I returned to Lexing-ton determined to raise $100,000 to put the Corsair back in shape, find a pilot, name the ship Miss Lexington, and take it to the National Air Races. A pilot and an ex-Corsair mechanic were found but I could raise only about $50,000 in pledges, and that wouldn't have been enough to win.
In 1972, my new stunt ship was ready for trim and lettering. If I couldn't take a Miss Lexington to Rena, I could at least take one to the Nationals. So much for the name. How about the airplane?
Having at one time or another tried six of the popular engines on the market, the ST 46 impressed me the most. An ST 46 really pulled my Mirage in the '71 season, until it wore out after about 200 flights. In addition, some of the 'stars' were using the 46, and it seemed to run with a minimum of trouble for nearly everyone.
Figuring on an engine size of 46, I wanted a plane with a wingspan of about 56 inches, as aspect ratio of about 5:1, with about 625 sq inches (including flaps). Aspect ratio is defined as the ratio of the span to the average chord, or, with complex wing shapes, the ratio of the square of the span to the area. After drawing up a wing to this size, I incorporated flaps that were 13% of the wing area.
The elevator I chose was 8.5% of the wing area, and the span of the stabilizer was 22 in. A front moment of 9-1/2 in was selected. The rear moment was 15-1/4 in.
Although not available when this plane was designed, a table of comparative stunt ship sizes drawn up by John Blum and published in the August 1973 issue of MAN could prove very helpful in design. Before this appeared, I had my own table which listed most of the competitive stunt planes in the past five years.
Miss Lexington's wing has a leading edge sweep of 1-5/8 in (against the Nobler's 2 in). Not much has been said about sweep, other than that it helps in flying. One thing is certain: Make the leading edge rounded and not too sharp - most of the good fliers will go along with this. I used a customized A-Justo-Jig (rcl1044) on this wing (it was shimmed and trued up by John Peck); I have also used a jig made of 3/8 round aluminum tubes on a homemade fixture. Either works, and is a big help in building true wings.
The wing center line is 3/4 in lower than the engine thrust line. This is about as much as you would want to go, and a lot of competitive airplanes have less. The stabilizer position is 3/4 in above the thrust line. This position also changes with various individual designs. Another item is how far apart the leadout guides are spaced. Some say that a distance over 3/4 in causes yaw problems. Most airplanes which I have seen have the lines about 5/8 to 3/4 in apart.
Most of the dimensions were a compromise from some of the airplanes that I have observed at contests, or have actually flown: I've had the privilege of flying several of McFarland's Sharks (oz4557), a Gieseke Nobler (oz10588), Al Rabe's Bearcat (oz5171) and the Sea Fury. Some of my design ideas worked, and some were not so good. I'll cover both as we go along.
The canopy design is from the F-106A, of which there is an example at the Dayton Air Force Museum - no bubble canopy with hot and cold running instruments, and Playboy magazines on the rear deck. Be certain to glue all the way around the windows to keep dust out.
Anybody who follows auto-mobile or unlimited airplane racing knows that the crew is constantly making adjust-ments on the machine for handling and speed. For years, we watched stunt planes which had to be literally cut apart to make adjustments - not so now, and certainly not on Miss Lexington. Adjustable leadouts, tip weight, nose weights, removable fuel tank, and, of course, adjustable handle and lines are now standard items.
If some manufacturer would just make a strong, dependable, and adjustable flap horn so that we could turn in degrees of flap differential, or make easy elevator and flap travel changes, it would be the greatest thing in stunt since foam wings. I've seen too many Kwik-Links break..."
Miss Lexington, American Aircraft Modeler, October 1974.
Direct submission to Outerzone.
Note colour photo of (the original) completed Miss Lexington model was found online at https://stunthanger.com/smf/open-forum/les-mcdonald%27s-amazing-care-package-just-arrived-from-miami-fl/
Supplementary file notes
Article pages, thanks to RFJ.
Did we get something wrong with these details about this plan (especially the datafile)?
That happens sometimes. You can help us fix it.
Add a correction
Do you have a photo you'd like to submit for this page? Then email email@example.com
User commentsNo comments yet for this plan. Got something to say about this one?
Add a comment
* Credit field
The Credit field in the Outerzone database is designed to recognise and credit the hard work done in scanning and digitally cleaning these vintage and old timer model aircraft plans to get them into a usable format. Currently, it is also used to credit people simply for uploading the plan to a forum on the internet. Which is not quite the same thing. This will change soon. Probably.
This model plan (like all plans on Outerzone) is supposedly scaled correctly and supposedly will print out nicely at the right size. But that doesn't always happen. If you are about to start building a model plane using this free plan, you are strongly advised to check the scaling very, very carefully before cutting any balsa wood.
© Outerzone, 2011-2019.
All content is free to download for personal use.
For non-personal use and/or publication: plans, photos, excerpts, links etc may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Outerzone with appropriate and specific direction to the original content i.e. a direct hyperlink back to the Outerzone source page.
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's owner is strictly prohibited. If we discover that content is being stolen, we will consider filing a formal DMCA notice.