Grumman X-29A (oz11015)

 

Grumman X-29A - plan thumbnail image

About this Plan

Grumman Aerospace X-29A. Scale model for PSS soaring.

Quote: "Tomorrow's fighter Today! Build this dynamic slope soarer and fly into the future. Grumman X-29A, by Malcolm Saunders.

THE GRUMMAN X-29A must be one of the most interesting aeroplanes flying today. First flown in December 1984, it is quite unlike any other aircraft flying, if only for having its main wing swept forward 30 degrees.

The need for swept wings first appeared with the advent of jet engine technology, engines began to deliver more power than conventional airframes could accommodate, a major problem was the onset of compressibility with increased speed.

Sweeping the wings back reduce effective thickness-to-chord ratio and delays the compressibility effects and critical drag rise at high mach numbers (something that is unlikely to trouble model aircraft until they fly at over 500mph). On the other hand, swept back wings do have undesirable low speed characteristics such as being prone to tip stalling, which effects full size and model aeroplane alike.

In 1943 the German Junkers Company proposed sweeping the wings forward on their new high speed bomber the Ju 287-V1. In theory a swept forward wing has the same effect as a swept back wing in reducing the thickness-to-chord ratio, while at the same time offering significant advantages by way of higher lift over drag in manoeuvring flight, lower stall speed, improved low speed performance at high wing loadings and is not prone to tip stalling as is the swept back wing.

The JU287-V1 made some 17 test flights and proved the aerodynamic advantages of the wing form. Indeed final assembly of the definitive bomber, the Ju 287-V2 was under way when the factory was seized by advancing Russian troops in World War Two, but that's another story.

Sufficient to say that the low speed advantages of swept forward wings apply equally well to model aircraft as full size aircraft. Indeed but for the problem of aeroelastic divqrgence, all modern aircraft flying todiay with swept back wings would almost certainly have had their wings swept forward - just imagine a Jumbo with swept forward wings!

Aeroelastic divergence is a major problem with swept forward wings. As a swept forward wing flexes in flight the wingtips tend to turn up increasing the angle of attack of the wingtips relative to the airflow, this in turn places a larger twisting load on the wing, which if the wing is not strong enough to withstand will eventually twist the wings off the plane.

To compensate for this divergence forward-swept wings have to be very strong in torsion to prevent any twisting that could lead to catastrophic loads. In practice full size aeroplane designers have got around the problem by sweeping wings backwards and using washout, wing fences and fancy flappery to compensate for the inferior performance of the swept back wing.

What Grumman have done with the X-29A is come up with a method of building a swept forward wing using carbon-fibres that is both strong and light. From my own and other modellers' experiments in the States, a veneered foam or all sheeted wing is rigid enough for a model aeroplane up to 60 in wing-span and 9 lb weight.

A second interesting thing about the X-29A is that it is the most unstable aircraft flying today, with a CG located 35% aft of the aerodynamic centre. It is totally dependant on three on-board flight computers to keep it flying.

All modellers are aware of how a model plane becomes more responsive to elevator control as the CG is moved back towards the aerodynamic centre, and most models fly with the CG a little in front of the aerodynamic centre.

Moving the CG back to the same position as the aerodynamic centre will cause the plane to be neutrally stable in pitch and twitchy to fly. Moving the CG behind the aerodynamic centre, as in the X-29A, results in the aircraft wanting to climb, dive or do anything buy fly straight and level. Such a plane will flip on a sixpence, and is impossible for a pilot to control manually.

In building a model X-29A this presented us with our first real problem, as we must move the CG forward, preferably slightly in front of the aerodynamic centre to make radio control flying of a model X-29A possible..."

Scan from KaoruKiyose, cleanup by rchopper56.

Direct submission to Outerzone.

Update 27/03/2019: Added article, thanks to RFJ.

Supplementary file notes

Article.

Corrections?

Did we get something wrong with these details about this plan (especially the datafile)? That happens sometimes. You can help us fix it.
Add a correction

Grumman X-29A - completed model photo

Datafile:
  • (oz11015)
    Grumman X-29A
    by Malcolm Saunders
    from RCME
    July 1986 
    45in span
    Tags: Scale Glider R/C
    all formers complete :)
    got article :)
  • Submitted: 18/03/2019
    Filesize: 564KB
    Format: • PDFbitmap
    Credit*: KaoruKiyose, rchopper56

003.jpg
003.jpg
004.jpg
004.jpg

Do you have a photo you'd like to submit for this page? Then email admin@outerzone.co.uk

User comments

No comments yet for this plan. Got something to say about this one?
Add a comment

 

 
 

Download File(s):
 

Notes

* Credit field

The Credit field in the Outerzone database is designed to recognise and credit the hard work done in scanning and digitally cleaning these vintage and old timer model aircraft plans to get them into a usable format. Currently, it is also used to credit people simply for uploading the plan to a forum on the internet. Which is not quite the same thing. This will change soon. Probably.

Scaling

This model plan (like all plans on Outerzone) is supposedly scaled correctly and supposedly will print out nicely at the right size. But that doesn't always happen. If you are about to start building a model plane using this free plan, you are strongly advised to check the scaling very, very carefully before cutting any balsa wood.

 

Terms of Use

© Outerzone, 2011-2019.

All content is free to download for personal use.

For non-personal use and/or publication: plans, photos, excerpts, links etc may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Outerzone with appropriate and specific direction to the original content i.e. a direct hyperlink back to the Outerzone source page.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's owner is strictly prohibited. If we discover that content is being stolen, we will consider filing a formal DMCA notice.